Mexico's nearshoring juggernaut comes to a halt as FDI levels crash on tariffs
Mexico’s allure as a nearshoring magnet keeps wobbling, tossed by geopolitical tensions and relations with ...
JBHT: STRONG TRADING UPDATE JBHT: CEO REMARKS WMT: VERTICAL INTEGRATION IN LOGISTICSJBHT: HERE WE GOPG: STEADYEXPD: NEW RECORD BA: DELIVERIESMAERSK: BEAR CAMP MUSINGSCHRW: HIGHER HIGHS ON THE RADARWTC: 'ONE RECORD'HLAG: EARNINGS GUIDANCE UPGRADE AAPL: GLOBAL SMARTPHONE SHIPMENTS VW: THE IMPACT
JBHT: STRONG TRADING UPDATE JBHT: CEO REMARKS WMT: VERTICAL INTEGRATION IN LOGISTICSJBHT: HERE WE GOPG: STEADYEXPD: NEW RECORD BA: DELIVERIESMAERSK: BEAR CAMP MUSINGSCHRW: HIGHER HIGHS ON THE RADARWTC: 'ONE RECORD'HLAG: EARNINGS GUIDANCE UPGRADE AAPL: GLOBAL SMARTPHONE SHIPMENTS VW: THE IMPACT
Words are important. The names we give to things ascribe meaning to them, but they also provide insight into the thought processes, and eagle-eyed supply chain observers with a keen eye on geopolitical language may have detected a shift in the way leading politicians are talking about global trade. This has been illuminated by an edifying article from Transport Intelligence founder John Manners-Bell, who looks at how terms such as “de-coupling” and “de-globalisation” have begun to cause rifts between trading partners and were increasingly “regarded as being aggressively anti-Chinese in nature as they are understood to describe supply chain policies which are designed to isolate China from the rest of the world”. And thus we have “de-risking” now making its way into common parlance.
For uninterrupted access, sign in or sign up to The Daily News, Premium or The Loadstar Enterprise Plan.
Comment on this article