Comment / ...Expeditors has a cost problem? DSV and Kuehne are worse off...

ABC
ID 67640707 © Sensay | Dreamstime.com
By

Many moons ago I worked on a relatively complex white paper for a research house in the UK.

I was asked to screen global logistics services providers and determine who the winner was for the year, based on a slew of financial metrics, including, but not limited to: operating margins; growth rates; capex needs; return on assets/equity; and other productivity-related figures.

What I found in 2015, I think, was straightforward: Seattle-based Expeditors (EXPD), with its organic growth penchant, and M&A-hungry DSV from ...

Daily News from £12 / mo  ·  includes Daily News
Subscriber Access

This is a Daily News Story

For uninterrupted access, sign in, subscribe or upgrade to The Daily News. For as little as £12 / month (£100/year), we can get you into the room where the big decisions are made.

Forgot?

Comment on this article

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • boris franchomme

    February 26, 2024 at 3:25 pm

    That EBIT per employee indicator is somewhat misleading for KN; as the company still has a sizeable CL (contract logistics) division, which by nature requires a larger headcount (blue collar) to generate GP / EBIT than let’ s say traditional forwarding business. Expeditors has practically NO contract logistics business per se so all of its headcount is directly related to air/sea/customs operations

    • Alessandro Pasetti

      February 26, 2024 at 3:27 pm

      Different product mix (CHB for EXPD instead of CL) is very clearly stated in the piece, thanks Boris.

Related Stories

Topics

CH Robinson DSV Expeditors Kuehne + Nagel Logistics on steroids 2.0