Competition concerns over DP World takeover of Silk Logistics
Australia’s Competition Commission (ACCC) has flagged a series of concerns over DP World’s proposed acquisition ...
The UK’s largest box port, Felixstowe, said yesterday it would allow containers to be delivered to its container terminals without a VGM [verified gross mass] after the new SOLAS amendment becomes law on 1 July – reversing earlier advice to the trade.
However, shippers that do not supply a VGM at least 24 hrs before the nominated vessel’s arrival will incur a charge of £77 per container to cover the cost of pulling the box out of the stack and shunting it to and from ...
'Disastrous' DSV-Schenker merger would 'disrupt European haulage market'
'Chaos after chaos' coming from de minimis changes and more tariffs
List of blanked transpac sailings grows as trade war heats up and demand cools
Shippers in Asia restart ocean shipment bookings – but not from China
India withdraws access for Bangladesh transhipments, in 'very harmful' decision
'Tariff hell' leaves industries in limbo – 'not a great environment to plan'
Asian exporters scramble for ships and boxes to beat 90-day tariff pause
Temporary tariff relief brings on early transpacific peak season
Pre-tariff rush of goods from US to China sees air rates soar, but not for long
De minimis-induced ecommerce demand slump could cripple freighter operators
Volumes set to 'fall off a cliff' as US firms hit the brakes on sourcing and bookings
Forwarders 'allowing the fox into the chicken run' by supporting 'hungry' carriers
Hapag 'took the bigger risk' when it signed up to Gemini, says Maersk
'Restoring America's maritime dominance' – stop laughing at the back of the class
Navigating tariffs: 'like trying to solve a Rubik's cube while colour-blind'
Comment on this article
Andy Lane
May 06, 2016 at 2:42 pmEnforcement (in terms of loading to vessels) does not really fall into the hands of MCA, but the Carriers. They are simply prohibited by international convention to load a container for which the mass has not been verified.
The clear responsibility for obtaining and communicating the VGM rests with the Shipper, as per the Bill of Lading. So unless the Terminals will charge to the Shipper, it is highly unlikely that any Carrier will accept such costs or any other punitive costs associated with failure to comply to a 2 year old regulation.
With less than 1 month to go, a lack of clarity remains and this will be to the detriment of all. This was an excellent forum (should have been held maybe 6 months earlier) to establish what is possible, what is not, and allow all to prepare for the inevitable by 1st July.