TPM: Huge rise in cargo theft prompts call for federal help
A huge rise in cargo theft in the US has left stakeholders pushing for “federal ...
The UK’s largest box port, Felixstowe, said yesterday it would allow containers to be delivered to its container terminals without a VGM [verified gross mass] after the new SOLAS amendment becomes law on 1 July – reversing earlier advice to the trade.
However, shippers that do not supply a VGM at least 24 hrs before the nominated vessel’s arrival will incur a charge of £77 per container to cover the cost of pulling the box out of the stack and shunting it to and from ...
Keep our news independent, by supporting The Loadstar
Spot rates on transpacific surge after news of tariff time-out
European port congestion now at five-to-six days, and getting worse
'Cargo collision' expected as transpacific capacity tightens and rates rise
Houthis declare blockade of port of Haifa – 'vessels calling will be targets'
Another CMA CGM vessel heading for Suez Canal – 'to mitigate schedule delay'
News in Brief Podcast | Week 20 | 90-day countdown, India and Pakistan
Threat to airport operations as India revokes security clearance for handler Çelebi
South America will benefit as air cargo traffic diverts from the transpacific
CMA CGM will carry on investing after 'solid' Q1, despite unclear outlook
Air cargo forwarders stick to spot rates – a long-term contract would be 'foolish'
Demand for transpac airfreight capacity returning – but 'it's not ecommerce-driven'
Comment on this article
Andy Lane
May 06, 2016 at 2:42 pmEnforcement (in terms of loading to vessels) does not really fall into the hands of MCA, but the Carriers. They are simply prohibited by international convention to load a container for which the mass has not been verified.
The clear responsibility for obtaining and communicating the VGM rests with the Shipper, as per the Bill of Lading. So unless the Terminals will charge to the Shipper, it is highly unlikely that any Carrier will accept such costs or any other punitive costs associated with failure to comply to a 2 year old regulation.
With less than 1 month to go, a lack of clarity remains and this will be to the detriment of all. This was an excellent forum (should have been held maybe 6 months earlier) to establish what is possible, what is not, and allow all to prepare for the inevitable by 1st July.