CBAM – most forwarders still can’t price what it costs their clients
The rise of the carbon border
HON: DEALS ON THE MENUEXPD: NEW RECORD XPO: THE REBOUNDCAT: PAYOUT UPDHL: LIGHTHOUSEMAERSK: ANOTHER UPGRADEFWRD: HEALTHY CORRECTION R: RYDER CEO SAYS R: AMAZON LTL ANNOUNCEMENTPLD: EV INFRASTRUCTURE PUSHDHL: RAMPING UP 'NEW ENERGY LOGISTICS' GXO: NEW WINAMZN: LTL SERVICE UPDATEGM: ENERGY PROVIDER MODEL
HON: DEALS ON THE MENUEXPD: NEW RECORD XPO: THE REBOUNDCAT: PAYOUT UPDHL: LIGHTHOUSEMAERSK: ANOTHER UPGRADEFWRD: HEALTHY CORRECTION R: RYDER CEO SAYS R: AMAZON LTL ANNOUNCEMENTPLD: EV INFRASTRUCTURE PUSHDHL: RAMPING UP 'NEW ENERGY LOGISTICS' GXO: NEW WINAMZN: LTL SERVICE UPDATEGM: ENERGY PROVIDER MODEL
As campaigners for ShipItZero protested at the San Pedro Bay port complex yesterday in a bid to end ship pollution, new research has suggested a novel way to cut shipping emissions.
Researchers at Northwestern University have proposed that lines begin using fuel cells that burn traditional fossil fuels, but then capture and store the carbon dioxide. The compressed gas can then be sequestered permanently, or converted into liquid fuel for re-use, potentially making shipping carbon-neutral.
Anthropocene magazine notes that sustainable hydrogen or ammonia fuels remain too expensive, and will take years to deploy.
“A better alternative for long-range freight vessels might be fuel cells, which are battery-like devices that can generate electricity from carbon fuels, producing water and carbon dioxide. This would take advantage of energy-dense liquid fuels, which would produce enough power for large vessels.”
Pressure on the shipping lines is mounting, with the ShipItZero campaign urging major retailers, including Amazon, IKEA, Target and Walmart, to “abandon dirty fossil-fuelled ships” and commit to zero-emission ships by 2030.
For uninterrupted access, sign in or sign up to The Daily News, Premium or The Loadstar Enterprise Plan.
Comment on this article