Tradelanes: Overcapacity on Asia-S America impacting alliances and rates
Carriers on the Asia-west coast South America trade appear to be on the verge of ...
CHRW: TOP 'QUANT' PICKGXO: KEY EXEC OUTAAPL: 'MUSK RISK'EXPD: SELL-SIDE BEAR UPS TARGETUPS: SLIDINGZIM: SURGING ON TAKEOVER TALKEXPD: CASHING INCHRW: INSIDER SALEFWRD: TRADING UPDATETSLA: POWERING THE UKUPS: DRIVER DEAL EXTENSIONMAERSK: BEARS UPPING TARGETSCHRW: NEW HIGHS AND PAYOUT CONFIRMEDBA: GREEN LIGHT
CHRW: TOP 'QUANT' PICKGXO: KEY EXEC OUTAAPL: 'MUSK RISK'EXPD: SELL-SIDE BEAR UPS TARGETUPS: SLIDINGZIM: SURGING ON TAKEOVER TALKEXPD: CASHING INCHRW: INSIDER SALEFWRD: TRADING UPDATETSLA: POWERING THE UKUPS: DRIVER DEAL EXTENSIONMAERSK: BEARS UPPING TARGETSCHRW: NEW HIGHS AND PAYOUT CONFIRMEDBA: GREEN LIGHT
In an age where flexible pricing is becoming the norm (Uber, petrol stations, passenger air fares), why does the cargo industry still stick to published rates – and rate increases? That’s the question posed by Mark Grinsted on CargoForwarder. And it’s a good question. As the annual autumn rate hike starts, he notes that in reality, spot rates are “the essence of the business”, and that works well for capacity – which is perishable and very much at the mercy of supply and demand. He also switches it around: how would you feel about a supermarket that suddenly put all its prices up 5-10%, saying they want better margins? You’d probably shop elsewhere. While he acknowledges the system may help forwarders put up their rates, he reckons it’s mostly done for tradition – not a worthwhile cause modern day. He urges the industry to come up with some new ideas next year, and cut out some of the time-wasting involved in creating the published rates. A provocative read.
Comment on this article