EU emissions reporting delay is 'kicking the can down the road'
European Union lawmakers’ plan to delay adopting new sustainability reporting standards until 2026 has been ...
Global port operators are beginning to head inland to service new types of clients and hitherto unrealised cargo flows, with an expansion of activities well beyond container terminal gates.
Partly, this process got under way as container shipping lines began their precipitous descent into eye-watering losses. ...
CMA CGM South Korean staff strike over bonuses after bumper 2024 profit
MSC switches two more Asia-Europe port calls from congested Antwerp
CMA airline returns two freighters, while ANA takeover of NCA looms
Nightmare for Bangladeshi exporters as congestion and tariffs bite
Tradelanes: Export boom in Indian sub-continent triggers rise in airfreight rates
Carriers introduce surcharges as congestion builds at African ports
Ports and supply chain operators weigh in on funding for CPB
Box ship overcapacity threat from carrier appetite for new tonnage
Comment on this article
Gunther Ginckels
November 20, 2013 at 8:00 amAn obvious move which i have been advocating in the APM Group for many years. Terminals should develop their extended gate concept offering receiving & delivering services to their customers – be it cargo controlling parties or shipping lines. Ocean port land and infrastructure has become way too expensive to expand further while the synergies between an inland controlled yard /gate and the ocean terminal can deliver a leap in operational efficiency benefitting all parties. And yes – there is also some extra revenue to be picked-up at attractive ROI’s. SEASC4U can assist.