As 'gift' season looms, airlines must know exactly what cargo they are carrying
It’s not just the loss of taxes or the import of illegal substances that is ...
GM: RAISING THE ROOF GGM: IN FULL THROTTLE GZIM: MAERSK BOOST KNIN: READ-ACROSSMAERSK: NOT ENOUGHMAERSK: GUIDANCE UPGRADEZIM: ROLLERCOASTERCAT: HEAVY DUTYMAERSK: CATCHING UP PG: DESTOCKING PATTERNSPG: HEALTH CHECKWTC: THE FALLGXO: DEFENSIVE FWRD: RALLYING ON TAKEOVER TALKODFL: STEADY YIELDVW: NEW MODEL NEEDEDWTC: TAKING PROFIT
GM: RAISING THE ROOF GGM: IN FULL THROTTLE GZIM: MAERSK BOOST KNIN: READ-ACROSSMAERSK: NOT ENOUGHMAERSK: GUIDANCE UPGRADEZIM: ROLLERCOASTERCAT: HEAVY DUTYMAERSK: CATCHING UP PG: DESTOCKING PATTERNSPG: HEALTH CHECKWTC: THE FALLGXO: DEFENSIVE FWRD: RALLYING ON TAKEOVER TALKODFL: STEADY YIELDVW: NEW MODEL NEEDEDWTC: TAKING PROFIT
The US plans to impose additional limitations on US carriers – most of which are freighter operators – operating in and over Afghanistan have been withdrawn. CH Aviation reports that the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposals, initially lodged in May, sought to restrict flights below a certain altitude, unless authorised by the US government and approved by the FAA. The decision appears linked to the FAA’s realisation that all US carriers operating in Afghanistan are doing so at the behest of government or military. Such restrictions, it reportedly admitted, would merely add a layer of bureaucracy and achieve little.
Comment on this article