MSC Antonia, a casualty of the epidemic of GPS area-denial
As one of the most common forms of cyber-interference, ships have had to contend with ...
WTC: RIDE THE WAVEFDX: TOP EXEC OUTPEP: TOP PERFORMER KO: STEADY YIELD AND KEY APPOINTMENTAAPL: SUPPLIER IPOCHRW: SLIGHTLY DOWNBEAT BUT UPSIDE REMAINSDHL: TOP PRIORITIESDHL: SPECULATIVE OCEAN TRADEDHL: CFO REMARKSPLD: BEATING ESTIMATESPLD: TRADING UPDATEBA: TRUMP TRADE
WTC: RIDE THE WAVEFDX: TOP EXEC OUTPEP: TOP PERFORMER KO: STEADY YIELD AND KEY APPOINTMENTAAPL: SUPPLIER IPOCHRW: SLIGHTLY DOWNBEAT BUT UPSIDE REMAINSDHL: TOP PRIORITIESDHL: SPECULATIVE OCEAN TRADEDHL: CFO REMARKSPLD: BEATING ESTIMATESPLD: TRADING UPDATEBA: TRUMP TRADE
There has been some hoo-ha on LinkedIn over Expeditors, and whether its cyber-attack had been under-reported.
It’s very difficult to report on cyber-attacks – not only are companies difficult to get hold of, both because communications are down and because they are really busy (and really don’t want the publicity), but there is an uncomfortable ethical dimension too. Should ransomware attacks be highlighted beyond the obvious supply chain disruptions? There is also an element of not wanting to kick a company while it’s down. On the other hand, customers need to know what is going on, and rivals need to learn from the mistakes, or good practice, of others. Either way, The Loadstar, Premium and others have reported on Expeditors, but here is an update for those that want one, from The Stack. And, it appears, things aren’t going well for the US forwarder.
Comment on this article