Electronic bills of lading a step closer with standardised framework
The Digital Container Shipping Association (DCSA) has finalised its standardised framework for digitised bookings and ...
Freight forwarders offering supply chain solutions to shippers should have nothing to fear from Maersk’s ambition to be the “UPS of container shipping”.
So said Maersk Line chief executive Soren Skou, speaking at this week’s TPM conference in Long Beach.
He said: “Freight forwarders make up 40-45% of our business and I don’t see that changing – the most important thing for freight forwarders is to have the best service at the lowest possible cost.
“I do think that if all a freight forwarder ...
Amazon pushes into LTL for small package fulfilment and UPS does a u-turn
New senior management for DSV as it readies for DB Schenker takeover
Volumes set to 'fall off a cliff' as US firms hit the brakes on sourcing and bookings
Asian exporters scramble for ships and boxes to beat 90-day tariff pause
Temporary tariff relief brings on early transpacific peak season
'Tariff madness' will prompt renegotiation of ocean shipping contracts
Forwarders 'allowing the fox into the chicken run' by supporting 'hungry' carriers
Response to tariffs by Chinese importers may see extra costs for US shippers
Comment on this article
DAVID FERNANDEZ
March 11, 2019 at 10:15 pmI think they do not take into account Maersk’s poor service to the Caribbean area, starting with the fact that they do not allow consolidators to get rates or board them with the excuse that they work only with direct shippers,
What Maersk CEO believes about it?
Christian Moller
March 17, 2019 at 11:32 pmFreight forwarders can’t be sure about this statement. The big shipping lines have to take more control of what’s inside the containers they carry (that is traditionally a forwarders job). Otherwise, they can’t compete against the huge web-portals in the long run.
Are the shipping lines (including Maersk), doing themselves a big non-favour by leaving utilization of the containers to others? Full capacity of a ship carrying 6000 TEUs (example) is fine, but what if all those TEU’s have 30% or more not utilized capacity inside? Who pays for that in the end?