'Hard work and skill' won Uniserve its government contracts, says MD
Uniserve has rejected claims it was unfairly awarded UK government contracts for PPE and has ...
The pages of The Loadstar have often featured a “procurement vs logistics” battle, but is it really so simple? The role of procurement seems to be changing, and is now often going way beyond simply negotiating prices and authorising cheques, and is creating more opportunities for outsourcing. Some of those revolve around procurement functions, while more outsourcing inevitably makes procurement officers even more important – a not-so virtuous circle.
Etail by air – here to stay or on a short shelf life?
HMM sees opportunities in Hapag-Lloyd’s exit from THE Alliance
The rise and rise of China's ecommerce platforms
Legal battle heats up over 'unseaworthy' and 'reckless' MV Dali
Increasing scrutiny could stall rise of ecommerce platforms, as TikTok faces US ban
DSV chief reticent on Schenker: the focus on growing market share
Another strong month for US ports as container flows continue to rise
MSC redeploys 'Israel-linked' box ships away from Persian Gulf
Alex Lennane
email: [email protected]
mobile: +44 7879 334 389
During August 2023, please contact
Alex Whiteman
email: [email protected]
Alessandro Pasetti
email: [email protected]
mobile: +44 7402 255 512
Comment on this article
steven ingels
July 03, 2014 at 2:03 pmPricing, availability, engineering acceptance, construction schedule, etc all have a premium place in the purchasing process. Now this coupled with outsourcing for sub vendoring implying 3rd party contracting and compliance offers a chess match of moves for the best chances for pure purchasing model successes.
For those who assume this is a simple process please understand that the function in its purest sense requires alot.