Green critics hit out at carrier appetite for LNG fuel
Following Maersk’s green partnership with CMA CGM, announced just one week after Maersk’s methanol “new ...
© Khunaspix Dreamstime.
You know, don’t you, that ‘air freight’ has become synonymous, to the general public’s ears, of all that is anti-environmental, anti-green, anti-good. And yes, it’s certainly not perfect on that front.
The casual acceptance that the air cargo industry is a wrong ‘un is currently prominent in the UK, where a storm has brewed over the contract for the printing of Olympic tickets being given to a US company, rather than a UK one. And, according to the first stories, the tickets were to be air freighted over – all 16 tonnes – in a blow to what was billed as “the Greenest Olympics ever”.
The London Olympic organisers were told in no uncertain terms that it was “unacceptable” to send the tickets by air. Despite their concerns over security.
It makes you wonder whether, if the organisers had said it would be ‘Fedexed’ rather than ‘air freighted’, the same storm would have arisen. One suspects not. Fedex is a household name, and somehow acceptable (as, of course, are UPS, DHL etc). People don’t necessarily equate the integrators with air freight. In fact, UPS is the official logistics provider, and yet no concerns arose about that. Despite the fact that it is an air carrier, offering air freight services.
So why has the more general industry got such a poor reputation? And where is it now, while it’s name is being besmirched? Wouldn’t this be the perfect opportunity for an industry body (yes, perhaps you, IATA), to be making a point about how airlines are striving to change, and that they are not quite as evil as the world likes to believe?
Except, maybe the general public has a point. In the Airline Cargo Management survey, 48% of respondents placed ‘environment’ lowest on the list of things that industry bodies should focus on.
It’s true, there are a lot of things that need to be worked on. But environment surely should be one of the most important – both in terms of the industry cleaning up its act – which it is doing – and also in terms of its image. The term ‘air freight’ should make people think of efficiency, speed and security. Which is exactly what the integrators have done rather well.
When it is perfectly accepted and unquestioned by commentators in the consumer press that ‘air freight’ is a terrible, immoral thing to do, isn’t it time for the industry to share a few facts showing how it has cut emissions? Not only that, but it should be explaining to a wider audience that there are other factors involved. It should be putting pressure on governments, air traffic management bodies and regulators to help cut emissions too. The airline industry – minus the integrators – is taking all the blame. And while all the kerfuffle about the EU’s ETS is going on, it’s an even more perfect time.
Sometimes this much-maligned and put-upon industry needs to be a little less toothless and a lot more proactive.
Comment on this article
Alex Lennane
February 10, 2012 at 8:23 pmFrom Mark Mohr, CSafe: The combination carriers miss out on the perfect opportunity to take their cargo case, whatever it may be, to a captive audience…via the in-flight magazine. Unfortunately, most every carrier I've been associated with has restrictions on such content. The only in-flight cargo marketing I've ever seen was the mention of a small package product on a Copa cocktail napkin and something on CO’s PetSafe program on an in-flight video. What a waste!
Sarah John
February 11, 2012 at 5:43 amThis site and its content is so nice, i appreciate you from my heart & sole, nice job.
air freight
Geoff
February 20, 2012 at 7:19 amThe environmental arguement is a political misnomer it is onlyused as an excuse to raise revenue. The 250+ mega carrier ships that ply the oceans create more environmental damage than all the aircraft flying can becasue they use very inefficient Diesel Engines which burn heavy fuel oil which is the dirtiest fuel going. This is why there is always a huge environmental impact when a ship founders. But as these ships are in such small numbers the revunue raising oppertunity is non-existent compared to the millions of passengers and kg of freight moved by air.