The Loadstar explains: onboard carbon capture and storage
So, what’s new in fuels, then? Amid the battleground of future fuels, a new technology is ...
GM: RAISING THE ROOF GGM: IN FULL THROTTLE GZIM: MAERSK BOOST KNIN: READ-ACROSSMAERSK: NOT ENOUGHMAERSK: GUIDANCE UPGRADEZIM: ROLLERCOASTERCAT: HEAVY DUTYMAERSK: CATCHING UP PG: DESTOCKING PATTERNSPG: HEALTH CHECKWTC: THE FALLGXO: DEFENSIVE FWRD: RALLYING ON TAKEOVER TALKODFL: STEADY YIELDVW: NEW MODEL NEEDEDWTC: TAKING PROFIT
GM: RAISING THE ROOF GGM: IN FULL THROTTLE GZIM: MAERSK BOOST KNIN: READ-ACROSSMAERSK: NOT ENOUGHMAERSK: GUIDANCE UPGRADEZIM: ROLLERCOASTERCAT: HEAVY DUTYMAERSK: CATCHING UP PG: DESTOCKING PATTERNSPG: HEALTH CHECKWTC: THE FALLGXO: DEFENSIVE FWRD: RALLYING ON TAKEOVER TALKODFL: STEADY YIELDVW: NEW MODEL NEEDEDWTC: TAKING PROFIT
Europe’s politicians have eased their stance on shipping’s environmental efforts, deferring any decision to include the sector in the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme until 2023. Seatrade Maritime Review reports the postponement gives the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) a further two years to improve its work towards reducing CO2 emissions. The move will likely come as good news for the shipping sector, which seems keen to delay efforts towards carbon neutrality for the sake of the industry. Sadly, it isn’t alone in thinking this way.
Comment on this article