Dates to watch for in the latest chapter of TACO's tariff travail
The whiplash continues. As expected, the White House won a reprieve in an appeals court, ...
US exporters are facing a doubling of costs should the Trump administration proceed with plans to impose a $1.5m fee per port entry by Chinese built vessels.
After an investigation concluded China’s maritime supply chain received unfair state support, US trade representative ...
Four crew members still missing as Wan Hai 503 continues to burn
Explosions and 'out-of-control' fire reported on Wan Hai box ship
Predatory rivals circle as the ripples from DSV's Schenker buy widen
MSC Elsa crew face criminal probe, as Wan Hai 503 firefighters battle on
'It's driving us mad', say forwarders as US court fails to end tariff turmoil
Transpacific rates ease as capacity boost proves too much for trades to digest
European port congestion easing – for now
CMA CGM 'testing the water' of the Suez Canal for more services
Flexport: Sanne Manders talks profitability, fire-sales and Dave Clark
More legal trouble in India for MSC: feeder vessel detained after box ship disasters
DSV insiders hit back at Kuehne & DHL GF – got a 'pro integration' going
Latest Israeli attack on Iran a threat to box ships in Straits of Hormuz
Comment on this article
Joshua Kim
March 10, 2025 at 12:18 amThe reaction of shipping lines to the USTR’s announcement that it will begin charging port call fees at US ports for vessels built by Chinese shipyards that rely on government support appears to have been somewhat exaggerated. Opinions will need to be formed with concrete data on what percentage of ships actually entering the US were built in China. The current vague and unspecified figures are simply a threat to stir up the US import and export industry to neutralise the USTR’s intentions. Of course, the public hearing should be followed by a discussion based on specific data.