Yield decline wreaks havoc on cargo earnings of big three US airlines
The unexpected spike in volumes during November and December failed to stem the decline in ...
GM: RAISING THE ROOF GGM: IN FULL THROTTLE GZIM: MAERSK BOOST KNIN: READ-ACROSSMAERSK: NOT ENOUGHMAERSK: GUIDANCE UPGRADEZIM: ROLLERCOASTERCAT: HEAVY DUTYMAERSK: CATCHING UP PG: DESTOCKING PATTERNSPG: HEALTH CHECKWTC: THE FALLGXO: DEFENSIVE FWRD: RALLYING ON TAKEOVER TALKODFL: STEADY YIELDVW: NEW MODEL NEEDEDWTC: TAKING PROFIT
GM: RAISING THE ROOF GGM: IN FULL THROTTLE GZIM: MAERSK BOOST KNIN: READ-ACROSSMAERSK: NOT ENOUGHMAERSK: GUIDANCE UPGRADEZIM: ROLLERCOASTERCAT: HEAVY DUTYMAERSK: CATCHING UP PG: DESTOCKING PATTERNSPG: HEALTH CHECKWTC: THE FALLGXO: DEFENSIVE FWRD: RALLYING ON TAKEOVER TALKODFL: STEADY YIELDVW: NEW MODEL NEEDEDWTC: TAKING PROFIT
It appears that the US big three airlines may be shooting themselves in the foot with their unpopular campaign against the Gulf carriers. CargoForwarder notes that there are rumblings in China about the “political climate” for open skies, which could “stunt growth”. Not everyone is in disagreement with the US big 3, a US professor has said that Emirates is “not a real airline” and that investor-owned carriers should not have to compete with those “with short paths to enormous government treasuries”. Or perhaps, enormous protection from creditors…
Comment on this article