DSV hits back in 'bait and switch' case, claiming deal was not legally binding
DSV has fought back in the ‘bait and switch’ case against it, claiming its offered ...
HD: DIY RE-PRICINGZIM: A RISING TIDE LIFTS ALL BOATSTSLA: CHINA THREATDAC: KEY REMARKSDAC: SURGING GM: SUPPLY CHAIN WOESMAERSK: ROTTERDAM TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF OPERATIONSATSG: OWNERSHIP UPDATERXO: COYOTE FILLIP GONEGM: SUPPLY CHAIN HITBA: CUT THE FAT ON THE BONER: STEADY YIELDMAERSK: SELL-SIDE UPDATESDAC: TRADING UPDATE OUT SOONTSLA: FEEL THE PAIN IN CHINAWMT: GUESS WHATXPO: SURGINGAMZN: LOOKING FORWARD
HD: DIY RE-PRICINGZIM: A RISING TIDE LIFTS ALL BOATSTSLA: CHINA THREATDAC: KEY REMARKSDAC: SURGING GM: SUPPLY CHAIN WOESMAERSK: ROTTERDAM TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF OPERATIONSATSG: OWNERSHIP UPDATERXO: COYOTE FILLIP GONEGM: SUPPLY CHAIN HITBA: CUT THE FAT ON THE BONER: STEADY YIELDMAERSK: SELL-SIDE UPDATESDAC: TRADING UPDATE OUT SOONTSLA: FEEL THE PAIN IN CHINAWMT: GUESS WHATXPO: SURGINGAMZN: LOOKING FORWARD
DSV has been accused of ‘bait and switch’ tactics, after attempting to persuade a shipper to ditch its existing forwarding partners – or renegotiate an agreed deal, it has been claimed.
In a lawsuit filed this month, rose farmer Passion Growers claims that, in July 2023 DSV Air & Sea (Miami) induced the company to transfer its freight forwarding contract for shipments from Ecuador to the US to DSV. They reached an agreement for one year (although the terms of the deal could not be filed, as DSV insisted on a non-disclosure agreement).
Passion, happy with the new arrangement, dismissed its other freight forwarders – and everything was good for five months.
But in December 2023, DSV “attempted to alter the terms of the agreement”. It tried to renegotiate, as well as expand the agreement to include Passion Growers’ shipments out of Colombia, says the filing.
When Passion Growers declined the new terms, it claims DSV said it would no longer honour the original agreement.
“Passion Growers had to find a new freight forwarder and incurred higher costs and expenses than those set forth in the agreement,” it claims. “To date, Passion Growers has suffered damages of approximately $790,060.”
Passion Growers claims: “[The] defendant’s practices constituted an unfair and immoral scheme to induce [the] plaintiff to alter its shipping practices to the defendant’s benefit. Defendants then attempted to execute a “bait & switch” by attempting to alter the terms and the scope of the agreement.”
The rose grower claims the DSV executive that attempted the “bait and switch” move was “well-aware that the position he has taken on behalf of DSV Air & Sea is wrong and contrary to the agreement”.
Passion is suing for breach of contract, as well as under Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
DSV has yet to file a response.
Comment on this article