Pricing deterrents have 'negligible impact' on shipping emissions, says study
Transport and Environment (T&E) has urged regulatory bodies to adopt “bespoke action” in reducing shipping ...
LOW: INVESTOR DAY UPS: CYCLICAL UPSIDEATSG: 'GO-SHOP' UPDATEXPO: ALL-TIME HIGH ON TAKEOVER TALKMAERSK: DIRECTIONGM: DONE WITH ITSTLA: LSP BATTERY JVDSV: ANOTHER BULL BA: BACK ONCHRW: STRENGTH AHEAD OF INVESTOR DAYCHRW: UPGRADEWMT: TAKING PROFIT DHL: ANTITRUST SCRUTINYFWRD: UPDATE
LOW: INVESTOR DAY UPS: CYCLICAL UPSIDEATSG: 'GO-SHOP' UPDATEXPO: ALL-TIME HIGH ON TAKEOVER TALKMAERSK: DIRECTIONGM: DONE WITH ITSTLA: LSP BATTERY JVDSV: ANOTHER BULL BA: BACK ONCHRW: STRENGTH AHEAD OF INVESTOR DAYCHRW: UPGRADEWMT: TAKING PROFIT DHL: ANTITRUST SCRUTINYFWRD: UPDATE
Hitherto, most of the debate surrounding the IMO’s tough 0.5% sulphur cap, coming into force on 1 January 2020, has focused on ships being fitted with scrubbers in order to continue to burn heavy fuel oil (HFO), or the option of bunkering with the more expensive low-sulphur compliant fuels.
However, in this excellent article, carried by our friends at Ship & Bunker, the author reminds ship operators that failing to clean fuel tanks completely before bunkering with low-sulphur fuel could result in contamination, push the sulphur content over 0.5% and thus risk heavy fines.
Shippers eye alternatives as Indian port workers prepare for 'indefinite' strike
Shippers breathe again as threat of Indian port strikes eases
Relief for Asia-Europe carriers as rate hikes stick – now transpac GRIs loom
Ocean carriers the 'outright financial winners' in a year of unpredictability
Air cargo industry 'firing on all cylinders', with ecommerce in the driving seat
Premier Alliance unveils main trades network ready for February launch
Evergreen may be eyeing a move from Tanjung Pelepas to Singapore
Loadstar Podcast | December 2024 | Holiday special: winners & losers 2024 and outlook for 2025
Comment on this article