Shanghai City Lockdown Photo 181766552 Shanghai © Deus0416
Shanghai, China's beating heart, stilled by lockdown. © Deus0416

The Shanghai lockdown could prove a more powerful driver of migration for China-sourced goods than trade conflicts and the disruptions of the past two years, one expert has warned.

Lockdowns have decimated international freight flows from China’s powerhouse, casting an ever-lengthening shadow over international supply chains.

Numbers released by FourKites show the two-week average shipment volume from China to the US was down 20% as of 29 April, from the period just before the lockdown. The two-week average out of Shanghai was down 22%.

Data from B2B payments network Tradeshift show global orders tumbled in the first quarter, which the firm’s analysts attribute primarily to the war in Ukraine and lockdowns in China.

The Chinese authorities have signalled the restart of manufacturing and shipping in the Shanghai area, but so far it appears to be faltering, according to observers who report many factories are off to a limping start, at best, hobbled by lack of materials, drivers and workers.

According to Bloomberg, a Shanghai Securities News survey of 667 companies found about half had resumed production with output less than 30% of capacity. A survey of Japanese-run factories found nearly two-thirds had not restarted production.

At the beginning of May, both the Caixin Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index and Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index of the National Bureau of Statistics showed readings below 50 for the second consecutive month, indicating that the sector is in contraction.

These developments cast doubt on hopes for a rapid resurgence of Chinese production and export activity.

For the most part, US importers and logistics firms have predicted a surge of imports from China rapidly overwhelming supply chains, but recently there have been warnings that the restart could be slow and cautious – a trickle of freight rather than a tidal wave.

And the mood is darkening. In a 10 May blog on the impact of China’s Covid policy on supply chains, Resilinc, a provider of supply chain resilience solutions, noted that many supply chain managers were considering options for decoupling from China and reshoring.

Prof Yossi Sheffi, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, says companies want to stay in China for the long term, given the outlook for growth in this huge market. However, unease is growing over the zero-Covid policy and its repercussions, he observed.

“It will drive people out of China more than anything,” he said.

Observers are looking to Apple for indications of a move out of China, as the company has been hit hard by the Covid measures in Shanghai. According to CFO Luca Maestri, lockdowns and chip shortages will slash up to $8bn from Apple’s revenue this quarter.

Intel announced a massive global shift in March, planning to invest $88bn on chip production in Germany, Ireland, France and Italy, in a move to establish a “more balanced and resilient supply chain”. It probably helped that EU leaders announced a $47bn “Chips Act” to stimulate semiconductor production.

McKinsey’s analysts are predicting a large migration in manufacturing over the next five years and expect reshoring and nearshoring to relocate up to 26% of global production.

Tradeshift numbers suggest Canada and Mexico are already reaping benefits from this trend. While they show falling transaction volumes in China, Europe and the US, invoice traffic from Mexican suppliers grew at 4.1 times the global average over the past year. Canadian suppliers’ invoices were 3.1 times above the average.

Comment on this article

You must be logged in to post a comment.
  • Scott Sereboff

    May 14, 2022 at 1:44 am

    Has anyone looked at the math associated with things such as chip production, or hard drive manufacturing, when production is done in China versus anywhere else? Where is the bisection where it simply becomes cheaper to manufacture these products at or closer to home? If that happens, then where does that leave the part of the Chinese economy that depends on being a major supplier for products such as the above?