UK firms should 'diversify sourcing' amid post-Brexit customs confusion
UK businesses should consider diversifying their sourcing from a single market to suppliers in Africa, ...
GM: RAISING THE ROOF GGM: IN FULL THROTTLE GZIM: MAERSK BOOST KNIN: READ-ACROSSMAERSK: NOT ENOUGHMAERSK: GUIDANCE UPGRADEZIM: ROLLERCOASTERCAT: HEAVY DUTYMAERSK: CATCHING UP PG: DESTOCKING PATTERNSPG: HEALTH CHECKWTC: THE FALLGXO: DEFENSIVE FWRD: RALLYING ON TAKEOVER TALKODFL: STEADY YIELDVW: NEW MODEL NEEDEDWTC: TAKING PROFIT
GM: RAISING THE ROOF GGM: IN FULL THROTTLE GZIM: MAERSK BOOST KNIN: READ-ACROSSMAERSK: NOT ENOUGHMAERSK: GUIDANCE UPGRADEZIM: ROLLERCOASTERCAT: HEAVY DUTYMAERSK: CATCHING UP PG: DESTOCKING PATTERNSPG: HEALTH CHECKWTC: THE FALLGXO: DEFENSIVE FWRD: RALLYING ON TAKEOVER TALKODFL: STEADY YIELDVW: NEW MODEL NEEDEDWTC: TAKING PROFIT
One for our UK readers – and anyone else interested in what the country’s international relations may look like should the country vote to leave the EU. The London School of Economics has put together a 14-page briefing on the various options open to the UK if the referendum results are in favour of a Brexit. And they have done a good job trying to make sense of all the claims and counter-claims – although there’s the initial caveat: “It is highly uncertain what the UK’s future would look like outside the European Union, which makes ‘Brexit’ a leap into the unknown.” Are we heading for a Norwegian-style relationship, or one based on the Swiss model, or go it alone as an independent WTO member? Decision, decisions…
Comment on this article