dreamstime_s_116968752
© VanderWolfImages

There are calls for an urgent review of container lashing practices and stack height restrictions after another box ship lost a huge number of containers in the Pacific Ocean.

The 13,092 teu Maersk Essen, en route from China to Los Angeles, lost approximately 750 containers on ...

To read this article you need to subscribe.

Help us to continue to invest in award-winning independent journalism. For an introductory offer of just £70 a year, or £10 per month, get access to all our daily news stories and opinion. If you are already a registered user, please login below with your current account's email and password to subscribe. If you are not registered and want to subscribe, please register below to subscribe.
Current subscriber
New subscriber

Comment on this article


You must be logged in to post a comment.
  • JOHN ANTHONY JAMES BROOKS

    January 21, 2021 at 7:21 pm

    Sirs, These Maritime incidents simply highlight again the environmental challenges facing the world, the damage caused by pollution is severe and unwanted under any circumstances. It’s a great pity but all nations need to become more self sufficient and not rely on cheaper manufacturing processes of the far east and China in particular. those of us in the west who have benefited must consider perhaps that Ex President Trumps policy of bringing jobs home to the rust belt was in fact a wise policy and is something all nations must consider if we are to survive on this planet earth – we must all produce locally and buy
    locally. As a ex Mariner it hurts to say this but we must face facts or we and our grandchildren will face the consequences.
    Brooks

  • QuaiOui

    January 22, 2021 at 7:43 pm

    For sure the parametric rolling imparts high loads.

    To date no one has mentioned quality of the lashing gear. That should be fully investigated. There is a very good chance it will be the root cause. Know the provenance of this equipment…..

    Know that the dynamics are known and the lashing systems designed accordingly. The design also includes are LARGE margin.

    Because it is the ships responsibility one would conclude that the fitting of the lashings would all be checked dyring stow and before sailing. But, these people have to accept that the lashings, part of ships equipment, are fit for purpose. Just because they look right does not mean they are.

    So let’s see some fully independent research done into the quality of container lashing materials manufacture and testing, before setting out at a tangent, that treats not the root cause, but rather the guessed cause.

    The writer is a degree qualified ex marine engine, with a great deal of experience in ship design and build, including containerships.

    • ANTONIO GARCIA

      January 23, 2021 at 6:32 pm

      Since the CARGO SECURING MANUAL was implemented 20 years ago, everybody knows how to stow each piece of cargo onboard, but ship Master and crew are the only responsible persons.
      It is the time of puting designers, port operators, charter operators, in front of their responsibilities under the laws, and improve their qualifications to not compromise safety of life, ships and cargoes.

  • I agree. Mohd Azmi Bin Ahmad

    January 23, 2021 at 1:02 am

    Taking the easy way makes your own nationals seek foreign shores for better opportunities.

  • Tommy

    January 24, 2021 at 9:10 am

    Are these ULCV fitted with any kind of anti-rolling devices, flume tanks or stabilisers?

  • Lasherman

    January 29, 2021 at 5:53 am

    They always want to look into the ‘lashing practices’ and lashing gear. Here’s a spoiler; it’s the same gear and practices that have been standard on container vessels for decades without (major) issue. What’s changed? Easy: carriers are pushing bigger stacks and, probably, ballsier routes in order to squeeze the most out of record high rates and low fuel costs.