As 'gift' season looms, airlines must know exactly what cargo they are carrying
It’s not just the loss of taxes or the import of illegal substances that is ...
GM: RAISING THE ROOF GGM: IN FULL THROTTLE GZIM: MAERSK BOOST KNIN: READ-ACROSSMAERSK: NOT ENOUGHMAERSK: GUIDANCE UPGRADEZIM: ROLLERCOASTERCAT: HEAVY DUTYMAERSK: CATCHING UP PG: DESTOCKING PATTERNSPG: HEALTH CHECKWTC: THE FALLGXO: DEFENSIVE FWRD: RALLYING ON TAKEOVER TALKODFL: STEADY YIELDVW: NEW MODEL NEEDEDWTC: TAKING PROFIT
GM: RAISING THE ROOF GGM: IN FULL THROTTLE GZIM: MAERSK BOOST KNIN: READ-ACROSSMAERSK: NOT ENOUGHMAERSK: GUIDANCE UPGRADEZIM: ROLLERCOASTERCAT: HEAVY DUTYMAERSK: CATCHING UP PG: DESTOCKING PATTERNSPG: HEALTH CHECKWTC: THE FALLGXO: DEFENSIVE FWRD: RALLYING ON TAKEOVER TALKODFL: STEADY YIELDVW: NEW MODEL NEEDEDWTC: TAKING PROFIT
Manufacturers, retailers and industries involved in the making, shipping and use of lithium batteries have appealed to US senators with concerns on the FAA’s Reauthorisation Act of 2016, on the safe transport of the batteries. They claim the new requirements, which came in on April 1, cause unnecessary disruption and cost, and that without legal enforcement of non-compliance, the problem would continue anyway. A letter urges the Senate to amend Section 2317 and put an end to “inconsistent and inappropriate regulations”. An interesting missive for anyone following the twists and turns of the lithium battery story.
Comment on this article