DP World aims for 30% in cut ULCV handling times with new terminal concept
Port operator DP World is set to develop an innovative new container storage system at ...
LOW: INVESTOR DAY UPS: CYCLICAL UPSIDEATSG: 'GO-SHOP' UPDATEXPO: ALL-TIME HIGH ON TAKEOVER TALKMAERSK: DIRECTIONGM: DONE WITH ITSTLA: LSP BATTERY JVDSV: ANOTHER BULL BA: BACK ONCHRW: STRENGTH AHEAD OF INVESTOR DAYCHRW: UPGRADEWMT: TAKING PROFIT DHL: ANTITRUST SCRUTINYFWRD: UPDATE
LOW: INVESTOR DAY UPS: CYCLICAL UPSIDEATSG: 'GO-SHOP' UPDATEXPO: ALL-TIME HIGH ON TAKEOVER TALKMAERSK: DIRECTIONGM: DONE WITH ITSTLA: LSP BATTERY JVDSV: ANOTHER BULL BA: BACK ONCHRW: STRENGTH AHEAD OF INVESTOR DAYCHRW: UPGRADEWMT: TAKING PROFIT DHL: ANTITRUST SCRUTINYFWRD: UPDATE
3PLs should not be re-branding their transport management systems (TMSs) under their own “white labels”, according to this interesting blog from LogisticsViewpoint. Listing 3PLs, and revealing their actual TMS providers, the author argues that the TMS solutions on the market will be the best possible – so why dilute that expertise, or perception of it, by personalising it either through branding or tinkering with it. “Logistics executives are increasingly knowledgeable about who the leading TMS suppliers are… In most cases, it will be a comfort to potential customers to know their 3PL is using a robust off-the-shelf solution that is not going away.”
Comment on this article