Cargo's pandemic heroics cannot prevent budget cuts at struggling airports
Air cargo is having a year in the limelight: the segment has kept planes flying ...
FDX: ABOUT USPS PRIVATISATIONFDX: CCO VIEWFDX: LOWER GUIDANCE FDX: DISRUPTING AIR FREIGHTFDX: FOCUS ON KEY VERTICALFDX: LTL OUTLOOKGXO: NEW LOW LINE: NEW LOW FDX: INDUSTRIAL WOESFDX: HEALTH CHECKFDX: TRADING UPDATEWMT: GREEN WOESFDX: FREIGHT BREAK-UPFDX: WAITING FOR THE SPINHON: BREAK-UP ALLUREDSV: BREACHING SUPPORTVW: BOLT-ON DEALAMZN: TOP PICK
FDX: ABOUT USPS PRIVATISATIONFDX: CCO VIEWFDX: LOWER GUIDANCE FDX: DISRUPTING AIR FREIGHTFDX: FOCUS ON KEY VERTICALFDX: LTL OUTLOOKGXO: NEW LOW LINE: NEW LOW FDX: INDUSTRIAL WOESFDX: HEALTH CHECKFDX: TRADING UPDATEWMT: GREEN WOESFDX: FREIGHT BREAK-UPFDX: WAITING FOR THE SPINHON: BREAK-UP ALLUREDSV: BREACHING SUPPORTVW: BOLT-ON DEALAMZN: TOP PICK
European airlines and airports are butting heads again, in what Air Cargo News describes as a “bitter dispute” over airport charges. During the Airlines for Europe (A4E) event, CEOs of A4E member carriers reportedly presented study findings accusing European gateways of charging “too much” for slots. The report claims European airports were some 23% more costly than a list of the 100 top airports compiled by the European Commission in its 2015 Aviation Strategy. Airports Council International Europe punched back, saying the findings were “highly selective”, adding it was a “massive lie” to say that airports were connectivity disruptors. A good old fashioned industry fist fight.
Comment on this article