Neoline blows in as 'a different type of shipowner and operator'
It is becoming possible for some ships to save a portion of their emissions by ...
ATSG: UPDATEMAERSK: QUIET DAY DHL: ROBOTICSCHRW: ONE CENT CLUB UPDATECAT: RISING TRADEEXPD: TRUMP TRADE LOSER LINE: PUNISHEDMAERSK: RELIEF XPO: TRUMP TRADE WINNERCHRW: NO JOYUPS: STEADY YIELDXPO: BUILDING BLOCKSHLAG: BIG ORDERLINE: REACTIONLINE: EXPENSES AND OPERATING LEVERAGELINE: PIPELINE OF DEALS
ATSG: UPDATEMAERSK: QUIET DAY DHL: ROBOTICSCHRW: ONE CENT CLUB UPDATECAT: RISING TRADEEXPD: TRUMP TRADE LOSER LINE: PUNISHEDMAERSK: RELIEF XPO: TRUMP TRADE WINNERCHRW: NO JOYUPS: STEADY YIELDXPO: BUILDING BLOCKSHLAG: BIG ORDERLINE: REACTIONLINE: EXPENSES AND OPERATING LEVERAGELINE: PIPELINE OF DEALS
One of the best ways for shipping lines to get round the forthcoming ban on high-sulphur marine fuels is to switch to Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). As a fuel it’s virtually emission-free, but its widespread adoption has been hitherto inhibited by its being more costly than the heavy fuel oil that vessels burn while on the ocean; as well as the extremely limited number of bunkering facilities. Both are being addressed – oil is simply getting more expensive, and distillate diesel is likely to rocket in price when the new regulations come into force at the beginning of next year; and in anticipation of that more investment is going into LNG refuelling facilities.
Comment on this article