European port congestion easing – for now
Port congestion across North Europe’s key hubs appears to be abating – although the relief ...
Large ocean carrier alliances are contributing to port congestion, according to Federal Maritime Commissioner (FMC) William Doyle, speaking at the European Maritime Law Organisation’s (EMLO) Spring Seminar in Athens last Friday.
Commissioner Doyle said: “In my view, we could be experiencing some growing pains, not so ...
Four crew members still missing as Wan Hai 503 continues to burn
Predatory rivals circle as the ripples from DSV's Schenker buy widen
Explosions and 'out-of-control' fire reported on Wan Hai box ship
MSC Elsa crew face criminal probe, as Wan Hai 503 firefighters battle on
Latest Israeli attack on Iran a threat to box ships in Straits of Hormuz
'It's driving us mad', say forwarders as US court fails to end tariff turmoil
Transpacific rates ease as capacity boost proves too much for trades to digest
Comment on this article
BN
April 21, 2015 at 9:05 pm‘There is no doubt that an 8,000 – 10,000 teu ship co-loading for six carriers in Asia from four or five ports for discharge, at seven terminals on the US west coast, is an extremely challenging operation requiring a complex stowage plan’
This does not happen in real life, also at G6 1 vessel does not call 6/7 LA/LB ports in 1 voyage
Andy Lane
April 21, 2015 at 11:04 pmFully agree with BN, what FMC describe here does not happen. Large ships or alliances do not cause congestion, that is driven by gross demand exceeding operational capacity.
Operational capacity (read efficiency) in SPB is less than 50% of what it is internationally (based on footprint and equipment assets). This is merely due to People & Process. It is good that FMC has relaxed any restrictions on operational best practice sharing which were previously in place or perceived to be in place – the inability to talk, learn and improve will cause more trouble than large ships and alliances.
The SPB terminals are the only terminals in the world where the origin load ports are expected to segregate cargo for “easy discharge” – where after the cargo will head in 2 to 8 hinterlands. Compare this with Singapore where the on-carriage connection puzzle from 1 vessel will exceed 100 and they are able to manage efficiently with a “random” stow as the process input.
Only when we stop finding “handy-hooks” and accept and acknowledge poor performance can or will any improvements be made to the process. Let’s hope we pass that first hurdle soon.
Mike Wackett
April 22, 2015 at 7:22 amThanks for your input BN and Andy.
As Andy notes the FMC has relaxed its restrictions on operational best practice sharing and the demurrage & detention report is a “discussion document”.
So, maybe some practical solutions will evolve?