Greener vessels could turn a profit under FuelEU programme
Unlike EU ETS, FuelEU has the rare distinction of being a regulation from which carriers ...
TSLA: NOT ENOUGHBA: NEW LOW AS TENSION BUILDSGXO: SURGINGR: EASY DOES ITDSV: MOMENTUMGXO: TAKEOVER TALKXOM: DOWNGRADEAMZN: UNHARMEDEXPD: WEAKENEDPG: STEADY YIELDGM: INVESTOR DAY UPDATEBA: IT'S BAD
TSLA: NOT ENOUGHBA: NEW LOW AS TENSION BUILDSGXO: SURGINGR: EASY DOES ITDSV: MOMENTUMGXO: TAKEOVER TALKXOM: DOWNGRADEAMZN: UNHARMEDEXPD: WEAKENEDPG: STEADY YIELDGM: INVESTOR DAY UPDATEBA: IT'S BAD
Now there’s a headline from Bloomberg, via gCaptain, that should make you sit up and take notice. A few years ago the European Union introduced its sulphur emission control area (SECA) which dramatically reduced the amount of sulphur content in ships’ fuel. The IMO has adopted similar rules for global shipping – in 2020 all vessels will have to burn fuel with a maximum sulphur content of 0.5%, compared with today’s proportion of 3.5%, although they can continue to use the higher-content fuel if using so-called “scrubbers” that clean the exhaust fumes. But the cost of scrubbers is currently prohibitive while at the same time the amount of refined fuel that fulfils the less-than-0.5% sulphur rule is unlikely to be enough to meet the requirements of the global fleet. All in all, its gonna costs a lotta dollars!
Comment on this article