Trump or Harris: who will be better for revision of US trade deal with Mexico?
North American supply chain stakeholders near-shoring to Mexico have increased opportunities for the region’s trucking ...
AMZN: EUROPEAN REVERSE LOGISTICS GXO: NEW HIGHSCHRW: CATCHING UPBA: TROUBLE DHL: GREEN GOALVW: STLA: MANAGEMENT SHAKE-UPTSLA: NOT ENOUGHBA: NEW LOW AS TENSION BUILDSGXO: SURGINGR: EASY DOES ITDSV: MOMENTUMGXO: TAKEOVER TALKXOM: DOWNGRADEAMZN: UNHARMED
AMZN: EUROPEAN REVERSE LOGISTICS GXO: NEW HIGHSCHRW: CATCHING UPBA: TROUBLE DHL: GREEN GOALVW: STLA: MANAGEMENT SHAKE-UPTSLA: NOT ENOUGHBA: NEW LOW AS TENSION BUILDSGXO: SURGINGR: EASY DOES ITDSV: MOMENTUMGXO: TAKEOVER TALKXOM: DOWNGRADEAMZN: UNHARMED
Yesterday marked the beginning of what could be a drawn-out spat between the US and Mexico, with cancelled meetings and annoyed tweets. Bloomberg looks at the feud, and argues that a trade war would be damaging on both sides of the border. Interestingly, though, it also notes that “Trump has a point”, as the US trade deficit with Mexico represents 12% of the total imbalance. Nevertheless, the interdependence of manufacturing supply chains, as well as the fact that some 5m US jobs depend on trade with Mexico, means a trade spat could hurt those in Trump’s rust belt heartland.
Looming 'indefinite' strike set for the Port of Montreal as tensions rise
Gemini warns of 'meltdown' when Suez reopens
Forwarders on the hook for millions following Debenhams collapse
Shippers to opt for direct port calls over speed of service, predicts MSC's Soren Toft
Fallout from hurricanes a greater concern than strikes, say forwarders
Spot rates ex-Asia still falling, despite USEC congestion, with more blanks
Flexible airfreight must find balanced traffic flows to keep networks in tact
Comment on this article