NYK signs up for direct air carbon capture scheme
Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage (DACCS), derided as one of the least efficient possible ...
JBHT: STATUS QUO GM: PARTNERSHIP UPDATEEXPD: NOT SO BULLISHEXPD: LEGAL RISK UPDATE WTC: LOOKING FOR DIRECTIONTSLA: SERIOUS STUFFF: STOP HEREDSV: BOUNCING BACK HD: NEW DELIVERY PARTNERSKNX: SOLID UPDATE PG: WORST CASE AVOIDEDKNX: KEEP ON TRUCKING GM: UPGRADE
JBHT: STATUS QUO GM: PARTNERSHIP UPDATEEXPD: NOT SO BULLISHEXPD: LEGAL RISK UPDATE WTC: LOOKING FOR DIRECTIONTSLA: SERIOUS STUFFF: STOP HEREDSV: BOUNCING BACK HD: NEW DELIVERY PARTNERSKNX: SOLID UPDATE PG: WORST CASE AVOIDEDKNX: KEEP ON TRUCKING GM: UPGRADE
If you work in the UK’s air freight sector, you will probably have already heard this news – but the implications for airport expansion projects around the world could be profound. The UK High Court this morning found in favour of environmental campaigners who had appealed against plans for Heathrow’s third runway on the basis that it was unlawful, being against the government’s Paris climate change commitments. Transport secretary Grant Shapps said the government would not appeal today’s judgment, although Heathrow might. And the decision could have ramifications beyond aviation, as well as the UK, according to the BBC: “More and more politicians worldwide are pledging to make their economies climate-neutral, but the appeal court judges have shown exactly what this intention implies. From now on, every infrastructure spending decision in the UK could face legal challenge if it doesn’t comply with the Climate Change Act, which mandates virtually zero emissions by 2050.”
Comment on this article