Port privatisation off, but Santos STS10 terminal concession will be up for grabs
Brazil’s Ministry for Ports and Airports has decided to expand the container handling capacity of ...
GXO: HAMMEREDMAERSK: BOUNCING BACKDSV: FLIRTING WITH NEW HIGHS AMZN: NEW HIGH IN RECORD MARKETS WMT: RECORD IN RECORD MARKETSDSV: UPGRADEGM: BIG CHINA IMPAIRMENTCHRW: DEFENSIVEKO: GENERATIVE AI VISIONKO: AI USAGEKO: MORGAN STANLEY CONFERENCEGXO: NO SALE NO MOREGXO: CEO EXITDSV: TINY LITTLE CHANGE
GXO: HAMMEREDMAERSK: BOUNCING BACKDSV: FLIRTING WITH NEW HIGHS AMZN: NEW HIGH IN RECORD MARKETS WMT: RECORD IN RECORD MARKETSDSV: UPGRADEGM: BIG CHINA IMPAIRMENTCHRW: DEFENSIVEKO: GENERATIVE AI VISIONKO: AI USAGEKO: MORGAN STANLEY CONFERENCEGXO: NO SALE NO MOREGXO: CEO EXITDSV: TINY LITTLE CHANGE
In the wake of New South Wales’ sale of Port Botany and Port Kembla to a consortium of private infrastructure funds as a way of raising cash to invest back into the state’s road and rail system, other Australian states are also looking to wholly privatise their ports. And so the debate over whether to privatise or not begins once more. There are strong arguments both for and against, and they are well-articulated in this thoughtful article.
January strike at US east and Gulf coast ports now inevitable, say forwarders
Indian air cargo really flying, powered by a booming ecommerce market
Tariff threat makes no waves as spot rates tread water ahead of new GRIs
Airfreight rates level out, but looming turbulence could see prices rise again
The Red Sea crisis and its impact on containership deployment
Trump tariffs on China a boost for exporters in Vietnam, Thailand and South Korea
A new trade war with US would threaten China’s 'historic' airfreight boom
€1.9bn handout for DB Cargo restructure 'is in line with EU state aid rules'
Comment on this article